Cruel world

My working week is full these days and I’ve managed to contrive it pretty much to what I want: 80% of the time in one job, the other 20% at the old gig, where I’ve managed to re-negotiate a new deal. All good.

Not perfect but. I’m a consultant, so while I dig amongst the innards of the organisation I am on the periphery when it comes to the politics of the office. That’s how it should be and that’s pretty much as I like it. It’s not always as clear-cut as that. You work anywhere long enough and you’ll form ties. As a consultant you’re dealing with people, and while your concerns will be very different to theirs you can’t help but have some sympathetic feelings towards them. In theory you’re separate to much of the daily to and fro; in reality you can’t entirely divorce yourself from it unless you live in a bubble.

In the old job I was witness to a substantial re-structure of the IT function. It was a long time coming and desperately needed so there was no real surprise amongst the troops, though a fair amount of trepidation. The outcome of that was that a lot of people were re-deployed – either to new jobs or, more commonly, through an outsourcing program and out of the office.

As an observer I was sympathetic to the angst this created. In small part I was involved as I had made recommendations, but this barely crossed my mind. For the most part I looked towards the end-game. All this was to a purpose, and the purpose was to create a more flexible, efficient and cost-effective IT department. Working there I looked towards that outcome considering what changes I wanted to have implemented. My attitude was pretty well all business.

Now I find myself in a similar situation, but find myself thinking very differently.

I was engaged 5-6 weeks ago by a newly appointed and dynamic CIO with a lot of ideas. Many of those ideas, rightly, revolved around the structure of IT. As an outsider walking in it was obvious that the structure was not right. My observation, independent of him, was that technically competent people had been promoted to management positions they were not ready for. It seemed to me that a layer of management was missing – these callow managers reported directly to a CIO who was busy with higher matters – and who, besides, came from a business rather than technical background. What was missing was that hard edge of technical expertise mixed with experience..

That assessment seems close to what the official reading, but it seems the proposed solution is very different to what I would have recommended.

Their solution seems radical and sweeping. A whole new layer of management is to be inserted – fair enough. This means an effective demotion for many of the incumbents, but shit happens. They’ll still have time to prove themselves. Except some won’t. Some, for reasons that I don’t completely understand, have had their cards marked. They’re outa here, and pronto.

There is in the office a sense of pending change. Morale is indifferent, people don’t know what to expect from day to day, but know something big is coming. Some try and engage with me. Do you know what’s going on? Are you involved? I plead ignorance, but it chafes at me. I don’t like being dishonest with these people knowing they are on the wrong list. That’s not who I want to be, and I think it’s wrong that it’s come to this.

Management have their eyes on the outcome and have swept the human cost under the carpet. I don’t think it’s been a deliberate ploy, but the lack of any communication or engagement of any substance with these people has left them dangling. Even presuming they might be incompetent they deserve better.

From a purely business sense I have concerns. There’s a lot of intellectual property in the people earmarked to go. They are in the middle of initiatives that will need to be stopped or re-assigned. Some are critical to projects I am planning. It is too much all at once, and foolish it seems to me not transition at least from one state to another.

If it was me I’d probably keep all of them and maybe thin out the contractors. If they were willing I’d have them sit beneath the new management layer. At ther very least I’d give them a substantial notice period so that a proper handover could happen.

None of that seems to have been considered. My concerns are acknowledged, and they seem surprised at the potential implications of this course of action, but it wont be changed. Soon enough the hammer will fall and these poor unfortunates will be asked to clear out their desks.

It doesn’t feel right, because it isn’t. Perhaps it will be different come the time, perhaps some compromise will be reached. For now though I look at them knowing what is to come, and feel guilty for what I know and compassion for what they will feel.

Say your piece...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.